Actionable insights straight to your inbox

Equities logo

Wayne Whaley’s TOY Barometer – an Update

Wayne Whaley's TOY Barometer is an extremely reliable seasonality indicator. Under a bullish signal last year, it was only the second time in 35 tries the indicator did not fulfill. In this report I update the data and look out another 12 months.

This is an update of the November 27, 2018 report, where Wayne Whaley’s TOY Barometer was discussed. It’s Whaley’s top indicator, and now that new data is available, it’s worth seeing how last year played out and what’s likely in store for next year.

Mr. Whaley was a quant before quants existed. He has a math background and has been managing money since the late 1980’s.

He considers the TOY Barometer to be the single most reliable seasonality barometer of forward stock market returns – so much so that he’s said if he could only make one trade/year based on one indicator, this is the indicator he’d use.

Whaley’s goal was to identify what he called the “kingpin of seasonal barometers.” He stated, “I implored my computer to take a few seconds to exhaustively study S&P performance over every time period of the year and determine which time frame’s behavior was proprietor of the highest correlation coefficient relative to the following year’s performance.”

What he found was there was a high correlation between the S&P 500’s returns between November 19th and the following January 19th and the S&P’s performance the 12 months following January 19. And since the 2-month period straddled the turn of the year (TOY) and the gift giving season, he called it the TOY Barometer.

Specifically, the period studied is November 20 – January 19 (if Nov 20 is on a weekend, use the Monday after the weekend, and if Jan 19 is on a weekend, use the Friday before). He only considered the price-only return (no dividends).

If the return during this 2-month period was greater than 3%, a bullish signal was given, and the market was very likely to do well over the following 12 months. If the return was 0-3%, the signal was considered neutral, and results were somewhat random and in line with what is considered average. And if the return was negative, a bearish signal was given, and returns tended to be very poor.

Since 1950, there have been 35 bullish signals, 19 neutral signals and 16 negative signals (including the one that is currently live). Let’s look at each signal group.

Bullish Signals

The 35 bullish signals have led to gains 33 times the following 12 months. The losses were in 1987, the year of one of the biggest single-day crashes in history, and 2018, the year that just completed. I did a write-up discussing 2018 being the year the quants got destroyed. Add this study to the list because although a bullish TOY signal was given, a -5.0% loss followed.

The average and median gains of the 12 months following the bullish signals were 16.3% and 15.0%. Here are the stats.

Neutral Signals

There have been 19 neutral signals. The following year was positive 12 times (63%) and negative 7 times (37%). The overall average and median returns were 6.0% and 7.1%. But among the “up” years, the average and median gains were 14.2% and 9.4%, while the “down” years’ average and median losses were -8.5% and -7.8%. There were several big up years (1995, 1996, 1998, 2003), and two big down years (1973, 1977), so even if there is a neutral signal, there’s still a decent chance the following 12 months will venture far from its January 19 print. Here are the stats.

Bearish Signals

There have been 15 bearish signals (not including the current year). Only 5 of the following years posted a gain while 10 posted losses. And 6 of those 10 posted double digit losses. The overall average and median returns were -5.5% and -6.8%. The “up” years posted average and median gains of 12.6% and 10.7%, while the “down” years posted average and median losses of -14.6% and -12.9%. Here are the stats. Here’s a table summarizing the stats.

The bullish years have a very high win rate (94% vs 72% for “all years”). The gains are close to the “all” years gains (17.7% vs 16.4%), so just because there’s a bullish signal, the gains aren’t much better than average.

The bearish years have a low win rate (33%). The gains during those up years (12.6% vs 16.4% for all years) aren’t bad, while the losses during the down years are noticeably bigger than when a bullish or neutral signal is offered (-14.6% vs -6.2% for bullish years and vs -8.5% for neutral years).

The neutral years are mixed. The win rate is 63% (vs 72% for “all years”), with the gains during up years being pretty good (14.2% vs 16.4% for “all years”) and the losses during down years being moderate (a little worse than bullish years but much better than bearish years).

In summary, most notable – and yes this table is a little confusing – is the following: When a bullish signal is in play, odds heavily favor solid gains over the following 12 months, but when there’s a bearish signal, odds favor a down year with a relatively big loss.

The current signal is bearish. The S&P moved from 2690.73 to 2670.71 for a 0.74% loss. A TOY barometer return below 0 has occurred 15 previous times since 1950. The following 12 months have been up 5 times and down 10 times. During the up years, the average gain has been 12.6%, and twice the S&P has rallied more than 20%. But during the down years, the average loss has been 14.6% with three losses more than 20% and six losses greater than 10%.

Odds favor the bears for the 12 months following January 19 of this year.

It’s also worth looking at what happened following the failure of the indicator to fulfill in 1987 because it was the only other time a bullish signal failed.

The TOY barometer was bullish the following two years, and the market followed through and posted solid gains too. So failure to fulfill doesn’t necessarily imply something is wrong.

For now we’re on a bearish signal…for whatever that’s worth.

Jason Leavitt
[email protected]

A weekly five-point roundup of critical events in the energy transition and the implications of climate change for business and finance.