The Political Nightmare and Your Investments

IRIS.xyz  |

By Al Emid for IRIS.xyz

I may not win many friends by referring to the current wrangling on Capitol Hill as a political nightmare, but since I don’t report on these events as a beat journalist, I can afford the occasional mordant comment.

I doubt that many will object to my choice of words to describe the current goings-on. The accusations between Trump and his critics are growing stronger daily. Meanwhile, Democratic Party contenders for the presidential nomination are trying to outdo each other in staking out their positions in the growing pressure for Trump’s impeachment.

As the situation stands at time of writing, the prolonged election cycle in the United States means that questions over Trump's continuing occupancy of the White House will dominate until the next election 13 months away.

Last week, we saw textbook proof of the connection between politics, geopolitics and market volatility as investors reacted to the headlines. Whether that will continue or whether, as some have suggested, investors become increasingly immune to those unsettling headlines, remains to be seen.

As well, the possibility of impeachment, though mathematically questionable, also hangs over the American economic scene and could impact the U.S.-China trade dispute. The possibility might also influence economic and trade relationships with other countries. The turmoil further threatens to overshadow domestic economic issues such as projections for slowing growth in gross domestic product and interest rates. Some companies may be vulnerable as a result.

These tensions, in turn, lead to questions about the potential effects on the stock market.

With all of this unfolding, investors need to balance their outlook between a far right and potential far left candidate, suggests Jay Nash, Senior Vice-President, Portfolio Manager, Investment Advisor at the National Bank and a 21-year veteran of the financial sector.

Moreover, unlike earlier cycles, the current political scene does not offer many ‘safe harbors’ to reassure investors. That has developed because the leading candidates — Trump and the Democratic contenders — propose to take policy in very different directions if elected in November 2020. That makes the outlook for bonds more confusing than usual.

The net effect of the recent rate cut by the Federal reserve is also unclear. The cuts might push the economy higher in the short term, providing an extended expansion. That might lift inflation or delay a recession, Nash says.

Those who increase bond holdings now will win if rates continue going lower; however, they could lose if inflation jumps and rates rise.

At the same time, governments and politicians continue to buy votes using money that they do not really have, and that triggers another set of problems. One investment strategy is to focus on investing in major multinational corporations that operate in multiple jurisdictions, Nash explains.

Microsoft [MSFT], McDonald's [MCD], Starbucks [SBUX] and Apple [AAPL] might not be immune to short-term volatility, but they are unlikely to be seriously derailed no matter what political party occupies the White House after the next election.

Cash-rich companies like Microsoft and Apple can experience a pullback in price when equity markets retreat but are unlikely to go out of business or suffer a permanent decline. At the same time, small cap companies without diverse customer, product and financial bases might suffer in a recession and are more likely to face bankruptcy.

Meanwhile, increasing portfolio holdings of cash provides three benefits: a cushion against surprises, a fund for buying opportunities and reassurance for nervous investors.

As a precautionary note, if the current political statements by the Democratic Party remain as strident as at time of writing and if it appears that they have a reasonable chance of winning, Nash suggests that might point to an underweight in equities leading up to the election, perhaps to 10% below long-term target levels.

The only thing that seems certain at this time is that the bitter wrangling will continue until November 2020. It can be argued that investors are unfairly caught in this protracted election cycle, which started almost two years before the election date. We still have 13 months’ worth of possible changes and we are nine months away from having a reasonable view of the outcome.

As the political scene stands right now however, Nash says more drastic changes are not necessary. He recalls that in November 2016 when Trump won the Presidency, many expected a negative stock market reaction. However, while there was volatility overnight, the negative reaction was limited. The markets were up starting at 9:30 am on the morning after the election and have never looked back.

Every investor is different and so is every portfolio. For those who feel concerned, step one would be to ask a professional advisor to check the portfolio for strengths and vulnerabilities over the next few months.

Original article at IRIS.xyz

___

Equities Contributor: IRIS.xyz

Source: Equities News

DISCLOSURE: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of equities.com. Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please go to: http://www.equities.com/disclaimer. The author of this article, or a firm that employs the author, is a holder of the following securities mentioned in this article : None

Companies

Symbol Name Price Change % Volume
MCD McDonald's Corporation 193.28 0.64 0.33 2,933,091 Trade
SBUX Starbucks Corporation 83.32 1.30 1.58 8,552,693 Trade
MSFT Microsoft Corporation 147.07 0.96 0.66 18,648,712 Trade
AAPL Apple Inc. 261.96 -0.24 -0.09 21,847,226 Trade

Comments

Watchlist

Symbol Last Price Change % Change
AAPL

     
AMZN

     
HD

     
JPM

     
IBM

     
BA

     
WMT

     
DIS

     
GOOG

     
XOM

     
BRK.A

     
FB

     
JNJ

     
WFC

     
T

     
NFLX

     
TSLA

     
V

     
UNH

     
PG

     

World Economic Forum at Davos 2019 - Ben Yablon Executive VP Salt Lending

Matt Bird sits down with Ben Yablon - Executive VP of Salt Lending - at the World Economic Forum in Davos January 2019