Actionable insights straight to your inbox

logo_equities.svg

Record Selling Leads to Nasdaq Short

Commercial traders in the Nasdaq 100 futures have been net sellers for three of the last four weeks.
Andy Waldock, owner of the brokerage firm Commodity & Derivative Advisors and the subscription service COTSignals.com, is a third generation commodity trader with over 25 years of experience on all of the main U.S. exchanges. Andy stays abreast of modern programming developments due to the trading programs he employs for his own account and managed money. He can be reached at www.andywaldock.com.
Andy Waldock, owner of the brokerage firm Commodity & Derivative Advisors and the subscription service COTSignals.com, is a third generation commodity trader with over 25 years of experience on all of the main U.S. exchanges. Andy stays abreast of modern programming developments due to the trading programs he employs for his own account and managed money. He can be reached at www.andywaldock.com.

We’ve been writing about the largest traders’ growing short position in the S&P futures. In fact, they’ve been net sellers in seven out of the last eight weeks. Let’s face it, size matters. The mini S&P 500 futures are the most liquid of the stock index futures and therefore present a much larger capital base. Now that the selling has spilled over to the other indices specifically the Nasdaq 100 futures we’re calling for an outright short sale.

Meanwhile, commercial traders in the Nasdaq 100 futures have been net sellers for three of the last four weeks. This has driven the commercial traders’ momentum into negative territory while Memorial Day Tuesday has provided us with the rally we’d like to sell.

This is the standard setup behind our Discretionary COT Signals nightly email service.This is the standard setup behind our Discretionary COT Signals nightly email service.

I frequently discuss my trading style as trying to line up as many dissimilar factors as possible to create a robust trading plan. This is where we shift gears from our Commitment of Traders (COT) analysis to our seasonal study. We’ve found greater success combining multiple market disciplines than leaning on any single area of research. The details behind the calculation of our seasonal analysis are beyond the scope of this article. However, the broad brush stroke analysis suggests the Nasdaq could be considerably weaker with relatively little risk over the next couple of weeks. Therefore, we feel that the Discretionary COT sell signal comes at a fortuitous moment in time. Finally, the Discretionary COT Signals are meant to be a short-term swing trading mechanism with most trades lasting less than a week. However, given the size of the imbalance between the commercial and speculative positions across the stock indices and the seasonally week period we’re approaching, we feel this trade could be part of a substantial move lower.

Let’s look at the seasonal performance table from our out of sample testing. Remember, past performance is no indication of future profits, and every investor should determine the suitability of the investment vehicle before placing any actual money on the line. That being said, I trade my recommendations…including this one.

Past performance is no guarantee of future profitability.Past performance is no guarantee of future profitability.

One of the most surprising finds in my seasonal research is the way these algorithms can pick consistent moves even when they’re decidedly counter-trend. The Nasdaq has screamed higher for almost ten years yet, the equity curve below is based on short trades only from this time of year.

Closed trade equity of out of sample trade. *Past performance is no guarantee of future profitability.Closed trade equity of out of sample trade.
*Past performance is no guarantee of future profitability.

One of the problems with the seasonal analysis is the lack of data. This makes proper in/out of sample testing a bit tough. We canvas the windows pretty thoroughly both forwards and backward, and through different methods. No matter the input, we always move towards a comparison between in and out of sample testing. We’re not looking for the biggest trades or, to be right on every trade. We hope to achieve the repeatable consistency of a pro bowler or, golfer. We employ Monte Carlo testing using the bootstrap with replacement methodology to verify the consistency of our testing. This leads to the results, below.

Monte Carlo testing is a huge asset when testing a limited dataset.Monte Carlo testing is a huge asset when testing a limited dataset.

This test is the result of 1,000 walk forward runs. One of the interesting points is the average return column. The mean is more than twice the standard deviation. This means that 95% of the trades should create a profit between 1.3% and 3.32%. Based on the $100k account size used in the calculations, that equals an expected profit between $1,300 and $3,320. Most importantly, our risk for the trade is only 1% above the opening price, once the trade is triggered.

We have five more seasonal trades we’ll be looking for confirmation setups on this month. If you like the idea of multi-factor trade confirmation and believe in the statistical repeatability of seasonality, look us up.

Here's the broad outline for our intended seasonal actions for June.Here’s the broad outline for our intended seasonal actions for June.

Discretionary COT Signals Free Trial
Seasonal Performance Results

With pandemic-induced supply chain bottlenecks receding, semiconductor stocks have been riding a bullish trend, making higher lows and higher highs.
To say the current situation isn’t pretty now seems an understatement, and it’s likely to remain chaotic for a while. Which is why it’s so important for leaders of all kinds not to fall prey to the very human tendency to go negative.
Bargain-hunting friends of mine have been asking: “Should I buy First Republic?” After all, First Republic is prestigious. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg got a mortgage there. Dozens of customer surveys rate its satisfaction scores higher than super-brands like Apple and Ritz-Carlton.
Many of us economy-watchers have been expecting recession, though with significant differences on odds and timing. Regardless, recent banking developments just made recession more likely and may have accelerated its onset.