Actionable insights straight to your inbox

Equities logo

Is This Time Really Different? Fed Tightening and Gold

When reading about the economic outlook, one can often find a sentence that â??this time is differentâ?. We donâ??t agree with that on the general level: after the boom, there is always a...

This time is different. They always say so. But what if they are eventually right?  We invite you to read our today’s article about the history of the Fed’s tightening and find out what is exceptional with the current cycle. And what does it mean for the gold market.

When reading about the economic outlook, one can often find a sentence that “this time is different”. We don’t agree with that on the general level: after the boom, there is always a recession. Period. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. And there ain’t no such thing as endless easy money, as Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff brilliantly pointed out in their book This Time Is Different. Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. They showed that financial crises strike with surprising repeatability. But experts and investors each time claim that “this time is different”, i.e. the old rules of financial valuation and economics no longer apply and that the new situation is not similar to the previous disasters. These experts are clearly wrong.

However, we sometimes claimed that this time really might be different in a certain sense. What we mean here is that the current tightening cycle is exceptional. Why do we claim that? Let’s take a look at the chart below, which displays the federal funds rate since the 1954.

Chart 1: Effective Federal Funds Rate from July 1954 to July 2018.

Effective Federal Funds Rate from July 1954 to July 2018

As one can see, the current tightening cycle is unprecedented. After keeping the interest rates at almost zero for seven years, the Fed was able to hike them merely by 1.75 percentage points during almost three years (or 2 percentage points, if we add the very likely upward move in September). In the past, the Fed was less gradual and more decisive, as it can be deducted from the slope of the line. But let’s dig into the data.

In the previous cycle, the Fed increased the interest rates by 4.25 percentage points in two years. If the Fed hiked now in the similar pace, the target range of the interest rates would be about 5.25-5.50. In the tightening cycle of 1999-2000, the US central bank lifted rates from 4.75 to 6.50, or by a 1.75 percentage points, the same as in the current tightening cycle. But over twelve months! Let’s move on. From January 1994 to March 1995, or in just 15 months, the Fed raised interest rates by 3 percentage points. Previously, the US central bank was even more aggressive: from April 1988 to March 1989, i.e. in twelve months, Alan Greenspan increased the federal funds rate by 3.25 percentage points.

Of course, we can go even further back in time, but we bet that you already get our point. However, we present the table below, which should help you to compare the current tightening cycle with the past cycles. As one can see, the Fed hikes interest rates now almost five times slower that it used to, on average, do it. And three times slower than during the last two cycles.

Table 1: History of the US Tightening Cycles

History of the US Tightening Cycles

Surely, we now have a different macroeconomic situation. We are more indebted. And inflation has just reached the target. However, unless inflation gets out of the control, the Fed should not hike very aggressively. In the past, the Fed tightened abruptly because inflation was on average above the Fed’s two-percent target.

Hence, this time might be really different, as we have now persistently subdued inflation due to the global supply factors, mainly the entry of Asian low-cost producers into the world trading system. During the boom, the low inflation was a curse, as it provided the Fed justification to not tighten and end the irrational exuberance in the housing market. But now it might prevent us from the Fed tightening too abruptly, which could have triggered recession.

All these considerations suggest one thing: without decisively higher inflation, we shouldn’t see a substantial rally in the gold prices. Gold should shine then not only due to the lower real interest rates and as an inflation-hedge, but also as a safe-haven asset hedging against the potential overshooting by the Fed. To be clear, we don’t claim that there will be no financial crashes anymore, or that the Fed will not trigger the next recession. Our only point is that with unprecedentedly sluggish central bank, the crisis is likely to come later. With Fed several times slower that on average, the unusually long economic expansion makes sense. The time for gold will come, for sure, but not yet.

If you enjoyed the above analysis and would you like to know more
about the macroeconomic outlook and the gold market, we invite you to
read the September Market Overview
report. If you’re interested in the detailed price analysis and price
projections with targets, we invite you to sign up for our Gold & Silver Trading Alerts.
If you’re not ready to subscribe yet and are not on our gold mailing
list yet, we urge you to sign up. It’s free and if you don’t like it,
you can easily unsubscribe. Sign up today!

Thank you.

Arkadiusz Sieron, Ph.D.
Sunshine Profits‘ Gold News Monitor and Market Overview Editor

Gold News Monitor
Gold Trading Alerts
Gold Market Overview

I’m pro-renewable energy. But I’m against worshiping any technology and blindly glossing over its drawbacks.