High-Quality Value Stocks are Being Killed by Expensive Junk

Wesley Gray |

1280px_Apple_Lisa_2.jpg

In general, investors focused on affordable stocks with strong fundamentals have been taken to the cleaners year-to-date.

Meanwhile, expensive stocks with poor fundamentals have been rocking!

Some Basic Statistics:

Below, we  document some core performance figures using Ken French’s data on value/growth portfolios (proxy for cheap/expensive) and high profitability/low profitability portfolios (proxy for high quality/low quality).

We look at the value-weight returns for the top and bottom decile portfolios. The monthly returns runs from 1/1/2015 to 6/30/2015. Results are gross of fees. All returns are total returns and include the reinvestment of distributions (e.g., dividends).

Specifically, here are the four portfolios:

  1. Expensive = Value-weight returns to the bottom decile formed on B/M.
  2. Cheap = Value-weight returns to the top decile formed on B/M.
  3. Low Quality = Value-weight returns to the bottom decile formed on profitability.
  4. High Quality = Value-weight returns to the top decile formed on profitability.

Here are the month-by-month results–a nasty year for cheap value stocks (as proxied by B/M) and high quality stocks (as proxied by profitability):

First_Chart_8_5.jpg

The results are hypothetical results and are NOT an indicator of future results and do NOT represent returns that any investor actually attained. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect management or trading fees, and one cannot invest directly in an index. Additional information regarding the construction of these results is available upon request.

How have Expensive Low-Quality Stocks Performed Relative to Cheap High-Quality Stocks?

In this section, we look at the YTD performance of expensive low-quality stocks versus cheap high-quality stocks.

We examine value-weight returns for cheap high-quality quintile and the expensive low-quality quintile. The daily returns run from 1/1/2015 to 6/30/2015. Results are gross of fees. All returns are total returns and include the reinvestment of distributions (e.g., dividends).

Specifically, here are the two portfolios:

  1. Cheap, High Quality = Value-weight returns to the cheap high-quality quintile.
  2. Expensive, Low Quality = Value-weight returns to the expensive low-quality quintile.
Second_Chart_8_5.jpg

The results are hypothetical results and are NOT an indicator of future results and do NOT represent returns that any investor actually attained. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect management or trading fees, and one cannot invest directly in an index. Additional information regarding the construction of these results is available upon request.

Year-to-date, a portfolio of cheap high-quality stocks is down around six percent, before fees and expenses (probably more like -7% if those were included). In contrast, a portfolio of the most expensive, lowest-quality firms is up around 12%, before fees and expenses (probably around 11% after fees).

On net, the spread is almost 18% YTD.

Incredible, but not surprising.

What Accounts for these Results?

When we look to the marketplace for live strategies focused on market neutral strategies anchored on cheapness and quality, the Gotham Funds Gotham Neutral fund is probably the most prominent example. The fund isn’t completely market neutral, but at a 25% net long exposure, that is about as close as we’re gonna get.

YTD, the Gotham Neutral Fund is down 10.39%. That is pretty terrible, and it would have been worse if they were truly market neutral, but in the context of the results above, where one goes long generic value/quality and short generic expensive/junk, -10%+ isn’t half bad. One could argue on a factor-basis that they added value (I know, that sounds odd).

Daily_as_of_8_3__8_5.jpg

As we’ve said time and time again, active value investing has been digging manager graveyards since 1900…but that is the nature of the active value investing game…long horizons are required and volatility relative to the standard benchmarks can be expected.

 

DISCLOSURE: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of equities.com. Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please go to: http://www.equities.com/disclaimer

Comments

Emerging Growth

IGEN Networks Corp.

iGen Networks Corp is engaged in investing in and managing for growth private high-tech companies that offer products and services in the domains of wireless broadband, software as a service,…

Private Markets

Lyft

Lyft matches drivers using their own personal vehicles with passengers who request rides through the smartphone app, and the passengers pay automatically through the app. When using Lyft, passengers have…

Cloudera

Cloudera offers enterprises a new data platform built on the Apache Hadoop open-source software package. Hadoop is a data-management platform that can consolidate data in a single repository for comprehensive…