Actionable insights straight to your inbox

Equities logo

Everything You May Fear about Modern Monetary Theory is Already Happening

Government spending has already increased significantly, and you can't blame socialists and MMT
Inquisitive investors can read Patrick’s clarion insights in the Macro Growth and Income Alert newsletter, where he infuses each issue with a macroeconomic outlook that points to the strongest sectors and best-in-class stocks. His fundamental perspective on stock selection coupled with Robert Ross’s quantitative rigor helps subscribers earn a consistent annual income using stocks and secured options. Before joining Mauldin Economics, Patrick was the managing editor at All Star Fund Trader, an award-winning advisory service near the top of Hulbert Financial Digest ratings for eight years. For over a decade, he was a contributor to Weiss Research, and he served as an equity portfolio manager for high net worth investors. Add to that his experience as a stock analyst, securities and commodities representative, compliance officer, risk manager, and even as a military intelligence officer—and you’ll understand why Patrick’s second-to-none research intuitions make him a trusted member of John Mauldin’s inner circle. Check out Patrick’s latest market take with a model portfolio designed for consistent income. Subscribe to Mauldin Economics’ Macro Growth and Income Alert newsletter.
Inquisitive investors can read Patrick’s clarion insights in the Macro Growth and Income Alert newsletter, where he infuses each issue with a macroeconomic outlook that points to the strongest sectors and best-in-class stocks. His fundamental perspective on stock selection coupled with Robert Ross’s quantitative rigor helps subscribers earn a consistent annual income using stocks and secured options. Before joining Mauldin Economics, Patrick was the managing editor at All Star Fund Trader, an award-winning advisory service near the top of Hulbert Financial Digest ratings for eight years. For over a decade, he was a contributor to Weiss Research, and he served as an equity portfolio manager for high net worth investors. Add to that his experience as a stock analyst, securities and commodities representative, compliance officer, risk manager, and even as a military intelligence officer—and you’ll understand why Patrick’s second-to-none research intuitions make him a trusted member of John Mauldin’s inner circle. Check out Patrick’s latest market take with a model portfolio designed for consistent income. Subscribe to Mauldin Economics’ Macro Growth and Income Alert newsletter.

Image by ClassicallyPrinted from Pixabay

Many Americans are worried about “modern monetary theory” or MMT.

They fear a future Congress will use it to justify sharply higher spending and enlarge the national debt to unsustainable levels.

That may well be the case, but most seem unaware these dreadful things are already happening.

Forget what a future Congress might do. Today’s Congress has already enlarged the national debt to unsustainable levels.

True, they aren’t using MMT to justify their actions, and it’s mostly a different kind of spending than MMT proponents want. But the budgetary impact is the same.

If the national debt is your concern, you might want to think about the here-and-now instead of future threats that may never happen.

How to Go Bankrupt

If your goal were to expand the national debt, you would do three things.

  • Increase federal spending
  • Reduce tax revenue
  • Raise interest rates

Those are what MMT detractors say will happen if liberal Democrats ever take control of Congress and the White House.

  • The “crowding out” effect of more deficit spending will push interest rates higher, raising the government’s financing costs.

You could argue whether those are actually correct, or if MMT-inspired policies would cause them. But today I have a different point…

All these supposedly terrible things are already happening even without MMT.

Spending is way up even without the Green New Deal. Tax revenue has flattened. Interest rates are significantly higher than they were two years ago.

These factors are all combining to push the national debt higher. So if you think that’s a problem, the time to worry about it is now, not later.

Rising Deficits

I realize this may be hard to believe, so let’s go to the scoreboard.

From fiscal year 2017 to 2018, federal spending rose 3.2% while revenue rose only 0.4%. That may not seem like a huge difference, but it added up to a 17% higher deficit.

Looking deeper, the culprits aren’t hard to spot. On the revenue side, corporate tax revenue plunged 30.9%, or $92 billion. That was due to the big tax cut passed in December 2017.

On the expenses side, defense spending rose more than Social Security even though the Baby Boomers are now retiring in droves.

But the real jump was in interest on the debt, which climbed 23.6%. Other categories of federal spending actually fell slightly.

The national debt—not counting unfunded liabilities like pension programs—passed $22 trillion last month. At the end of FY 2016, it was $19.6 trillion. So the debt has grown more than 12% in the last two fiscal years.

MMT might do no better (and possibly worse) if its proponents gain power, but it’s not like everything is swell right now.

MMT Isn’t Doing This

Of course, there are explanations for those dismal numbers. The corporate tax cut is supposed to stimulate the economy and eventually raise tax revenue. Maybe it will, but it hasn’t yet.

It’s also true the Fed may stop hiking short-term interest rates and even reduce them. That would help the government’s borrowing costs. But again, it’s just a guess at this point.

Meanwhile, the economic expansion is growing old. Many experts expect a recession in the next year or two. Even a mild recession will reduce tax revenue and raise spending even more than is happening now.

This is not a sustainable situation, and it isn’t the fault of MMT, or socialists, or crazy left-wingers. None of those groups have had any power recently.

Whether MMT advocates would do any better is a different question. Maybe they wouldn’t. But they aren’t the ones creating more debt, at least for now.

Someone else did that.


Get one of the world’s most widely read investment newsletters… free

I’m a senior editor at Mauldin Economics, helping New York Times best-seller John Mauldin publish his highly acclaimed economic analysis. Since 2001, investors have turned to his Thoughts from the Frontline to be informed about what’s really going on in the economy. Join hundreds of thousands of readers, and get it free in your inbox every week.

As we say goodbye to 2023, there's a compelling argument to keep your portfolio anchored in growth stocks next year.