Does Owning a Home Make Sense for Everyone?

Jacob Harper |

The belief that every American deserves to own a home no matter their financial status played a role in putting the country into deep recession, one that was the worst financial calamity since the Great Depression. But despite the lessons supposedly learned from the subprime debacle that led to the resulting global economic meltdown in 2008, one of the Big Four banks is once again considering handing out home loans that fall into the “subprime” category.

Wells Fargo (WFC) has announced they will be notching down the minimum credit score requirement to 600, or into subprime territory. The increased appetite for increased risk makes sense. Wall Street is coming off its best year since that meltdown, with the S&P 500 notching a 29 percent gain.

Lend! Lend! Lend!

In good times, banks are more willing to give out favorable loans, even to customers with a less-than-stellar chance of paying the loan back. They are all too willing to take that risk when profits are up and the economy remains strong.

Of course, as we learned a scant five years ago, that risk can blow up in the banks' faces in fantastic fashion. The limitations put on subprime lending this time around as a result of Dodd-Frank will mitigate the risk for mass default may possibly mitigate that risk. And the new loans will certainly avoid the staggering teaser rates, and require much larger down payments from customers with poor credit scores.

However, the real issue is not whether or not subprime customers are worthy of a mortgage. It’s whether or not it’s even in their best interest to take one out.

Owning a Home Can Hurt Your Mobility

When a customer is tied down to a property, it makes it that much harder to move for a job. In many cases, the equity accumulated via home ownership does not offset the potential financial gains of mobility.

A 2013 study conducted by the Peterson Institute of International Economics at the beginning of the global financial rebound found that high home ownership rates “slowly decimates the labor market.” The affects can take up to five years to be felt, but the results play out the same. New homeowners get tied down to the homes they own and are thus unable to move when the jobs do.

The authors of the study theorized that high ownership rates tended to stifle innovation and job creation, and tended to increase a person’s commute times, further sapping worker’s productivity while increasing transportation costs.

So Why the Push to Own?

There are benefits to home ownership, to be sure. Equity is a marvelous thing, and getting in on an area before it booms out can reap high rewards.

But for the banks and the majority of consumers, the sell on home ownership is simply that it is the single most important representation of what it means to realize the American Dream. President Obama said as much in a housing policy speech he gave in Aug. 2013 when he called home ownership “the most tangible cornerstone at the heart of middle-class life… A home was a source of pride and security. It was a place to raise children, put down roots, and build up savings for college, or a business, or retirement.”

If consumers wish to buy that tangible cornerstone to prove their place in the middle class, it is their prerogative to do so. And banks like Wells Fargo will supply those loans, as they have increased profits but look to strengthen a mortgage loan sector that has hit its lowest returns in five years.

But as a way to increase savings or potential earnings, for many people home ownership is less than ideal. Consider that since 1975, owning a home would have returned on average 4.5 percent, versus a 9.8 percent if that same capital would have been put in the stock market.

For customers with worrying credit scores, home ownership might be a physical representation of class ascension, but it’s not always the best economic decision.





DISCLOSURE: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please go to:


Symbol Name Price Change % Volume
MTMC MTM Technologies Inc n/a n/a n/a 0
WFC Wells Fargo & Company 46.41 0.26 0.56 25,661,020


Emerging Growth

H-Source Holdings Ltd.

H-Source Holdings Inc. is a technology company operating within the healthcare industry through its subsidiary, H-Source, Inc. The Company has developed a transaction platform that provides a private, secure and…

Private Markets


A peer-to-Peer authentic photo marketplace disrupting the $10B commercial photography industry.


Uber connects riders with safe, reliable, convenient transportation providers at a variety of price-points in cities around the world. Uber makes money from charging their drivers 20% of the fare…