Declining Profits and Higher Credit Costs Add Risk to Titan Machinery as a Going Concern

Michael Markowski |

Titan Machinery shareholders and investors should be concerned about several new issues surrounding the company’s balance sheet and income statement, which are having a direct effect on the credit terms of their $150 million bond with Wells Fargo. The company increased Total Liabilities for its first quarter ending April 30, 2014 by $38 million to a record $1.19 billion. These added liabilities increase the risk that Titan could violate the net leverage ratio in the credit agreement that that it has with Wells Fargo. Management’s strategy to borrow to build up inventory by $41 million to $1.12 billion during its first quarter of 2015 (ending April 30, 2014) and to also increase its inventory during its second quarter (ending July 31, 2014) and then to only have to liquidate at least $291 million in inventory in it last two fiscal quarters to meet its inventory reduction guidance is risky.

Due to the amending of Titan’s credit agreement with Wells Fargo in April of 2014, the company now has a new minimum net income requirement that it must meet. With the adding of the new requirement and the company still having to meet its pre-existing maximum liabilities requirement the risk that Titan might violate its credit agreement increases considerably. Titan now has two key credit agreement requirements that it must meet which are mutually exclusive. The conflict between the two requirements is that, should Titan have to liquidate its inventory at a discount in order to reduce its liabilities, it could potentially violate its net income requirement. Titan’s increasing its liabilities and inventory over its most recent quarter along with its guidance that it will increase its inventory in its current quarter ending July 31st only exacerbates the situation

Amendments to Wells Fargo Credit Agreement Requirements

Under Wells Fargo’s new “Consolidated Net Income” credit agreement requirement, Titan must maintain minimum net income for its trailing 12 months of $5 million for its second quarter ending July 31, 2015 and third quarter ending October 31, 2014. The minimum increases to $10 million for its 12 months ending January 31, 2015.

The third amendment to the Wells Fargo credit agreement specifies that Titan can exclude its after tax losses of $6.1 million ($10.0 million pre-tax) for its fourth fiscal quarter of 2014 and $1.9 million ($3.2 million pre-tax) for its first fiscal quarter of 2015 from its calculation of Consolidated Net Income. Based on adding back the combined $8.0 million of the net or after tax charges to Titan’s realized $5.1 million of Consolidated Net Income for its 12 months ended April 31, 2014, the company generated $13.1 million of Consolidated Net Income for its latest trailing 12 months.

The existing “Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio” requirement that Titan must meet is that its Total Liabilities cannot be greater than 3.25 times its tangible equity for its quarters ending July 31stor October 31st. The ratio lowers to 3.0 for its quarter ending January 31, 2015.

Based on Titan’s current tangible book value of approximately $370 million at April 30th the company’s Total Liabilities can not exceed $1.20 billion at July 31st or October 31 stand $1.11 billion at January 31, 2015. Due to Titan’s having Total Liabilities of $1.19 billion for its quarter ended April 30th it’s currently within $10 million of the maximum permitted by October 31st. The current amount exceeds the $1.11 billion in Total Liabilities that Titan is permitted to have at January 31, 2014, by $80 million.

Wells Fargo Amends Credit Agreement for Protection against Weakening Fundamentals

We believe that the insertion of the new Consolidated Net Income minimums into Titan’s credit agreement was due to Wells Fargo becoming increasingly nervous after the company had to take write offs for its last two fiscal quarters. In April Titan reported FY2014 results and disclosed a non-cash impairment charge of $10.0 million ($6.1 million after tax) for its fourth quarter of 2014 and a $3.2 million ($1.9 million after tax) realignment charge for its first quarter of 2015. Also in April, Titan gave guidance that it would reduce its inventory by $250 million before the end of its 2015 fiscal year as compared to the amount on hand at January 31, 2014, we suspect that may have been motivated by Wells Fargo tightening.

When Wells Fargo originally loaned Titan Machinery $150 million two years ago, they created the loan in the form a convertible. The recent poor performance of Titan Machinery’s underlying business has caused the investment bank to move their focus from the equity upside and to zero in on hoping it will ever regain their principal. Wells Fargo made the mistake of agreeing to price their equity conversion at $43 per share based on Titan's year-end earnings of $44 million for the Fiscal Year 2012. Had Wells Fargo paid closer attention to Titan’s negative $182 million of cash flow from operations, they would have been more critical of the Titan business model. With Titan closing eight of its stores less than 60 days ago, and its trailing 12 month net income dwindling from $44 million in Fiscal 2012 to a mere $5.1 million for the trailing 12 months ending April 30, 2014; the weak quality of its earnings are surfacing. With the release of its first quarter financials, the company has reported two consecutive quarters of losses for the first time in the company's history.

Wells Fargo has been generating a great deal of fees from the note. However, with their third amendment of the credit agreement they are now tightening the covenants as it becomes increasingly apparent that there is a risk that Titan may be unable to pay off the loan.

Orderly Liquidation of Inventory Could be a Problem

Six weeks from now, on August 1st, Titan will enter its second half of fiscal 2015. Over its last two fiscal quarters, the company will have to liquidate more than $291 million of its inventory to meet the inventory guidance level of $826 million by January 31, 2015. The actual amount to be liquidated has yet to be determined because management has stated that its inventory will increase for its second 2015 fiscal quarter as compared to the amount of inventory which it had at the end of its first 2015 fiscal quarter but didn’t disclose an exact amount nor range.

Titan does not have a history of decreasing its inventory between its second and third fiscal quarters. For its fiscal 2014 third quarter ended October 31, 2013; its inventory increased by $70 million as compared to its prior fiscal second quarter. In fiscal 2013, Titan’s inventory increased by $110 million from its second to its third quarter.

The company’s management in its “Q1 2005 earnings presentation”, stated that the prices for used agricultural equipment had been under pressure “due to higher industry levels of used equipment”. The majority of Titan’s used inventories consist of agricultural equipment due to the fact that the revenue which it derives from selling agricultural equipment is 3.5 times greater than its construction equipment sales. On June 11th, after the USDA revised their outlook for the 2014 corn crop, an economist predictedthat the price of corn would decline by 20% for calendar 2014 as compared to 2013, thereby; potentially reducing farm discretionary income for capital goods investments.

The big question facing Titan is how drastic will the haircut be when it starts to liquidate at least $291 million of its inventory from their present level of $1.17 billion to $826 million? Assuming a modest discount of 5% wouldput the company on the threshold of violating its credit agreement with Wells Fargo and a discount of 10% or more would most likely result in Titan violating its credit entirely.

There are many macro challenges facing the machinery equipment industry and Titan only being a reseller, already is at a disadvantage. It competes directly with manufacturers including Caterpillar (CAT) , Deere Co (DE) , CNH ($CNHI), & AGCO Corp. (AGRO) . During its last two quarters of fiscal 2015, Titan’s management will not only need to generate revenue at a profit, but will also have the added pressure from Wells Fargo to meet minimum requirements to conform with the amendments to the credit agreement.

Titan will have to liquidate its inventory to insure that its liabilities do not go above the maximum allowed under its Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio requirement. Titan will also have to generate the net income to meet its minimum Consolidated Net Income requirement. A violation of either of the requirements could result in Wells Fargo calling the loan and Titan only having $80 million cash on hand would not be able to return the $150 million which could cause the company to potentially file for bankruptcy protection.

Titan’s Financial Problems Are All-Encompassing

In its June 2014 announcement for its first quarter 2015 results, Titan stated that it had “generated $10.7 million in adjusted operating cash flow”. The reality is that Titan generated a negative $54.6 million of operating cash flow for its most recent quarter. This compared to negative operating cash flow of $6.3 million for its previous year’s same fiscal quarter.

Titan adjusted its negative operating cash flow from a negative $54,602,000 to an adjusted (NON GAAP) positive cash flow of $10,703,000 for the quarter. Titan adjusted (or added) the $65,305,000 of cash provided by its Floor Plan financings to its Cash Flow from Operations section of its Cash Flow Statement to reach the positive NON GAAP number. The only way that it has been able to increase the cash that it has in the bank is by increasing its borrowings or issuing and selling its shares. Titan’s growth has been totally dependent on growing its short and long term debt which have both increased for the past three consecutive years. For anyone to say that Titan generates cash from its operations would be a figment of their imagination.

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities



Net cash used for operating activities



Net change in non-manufacturer floor plan payable



Adjusted net cash provided by operating activities





In my previous April 16, 2014 report on Titan, “Titan Machinery’s Inventory Reduction Guidance will Lower Future Sales Significantly”; I said that based on what I had learned from management’s guidance for fiscal 2015, that Titan would no longer be viewed as a growth company and that it should be “relegated to be a cyclical tractor dealership”. I also predicted that its share price was “headed to below $10 and that the possibility of it having to file bankruptcy remains.” The price of a Titan shares have since fallen from $18.51 to as low as $15.34. Based on the research that I have conducted on its most recent quarterly report and the recent price action of Titan shares, the probability of my predictions happening has increased considerably.

I started following Titan religiously after it had been diagnosed by as having The EPS Syndromefor two consecutive quarters. The formula for The EPS Syndromethat I developed is based on a Cash Flow/Income Statement anomaly that I discovered when conducting a post mortem autopsy on Enron. The formula was converted into an algorithm which Stockdiagnostics.comutilizes to automatically diagnose public companies which have The EPS Syndrome. Its predicted share price collapses and the bankruptcies of more than 100 companies over the past 10 years. Over the years, I discovered that those companies having multiple diagnoses, which included Lehman Brothers, had a higher probability of going bankrupt. We believe that Wells Fargo’s insertion of its new Consolidated Net Income maintenance requirement into Titan’s credit agreement is the catalyst that could put Titan into bankruptcy by as early as thisOctober. A video about The EPS syndromethat also covers some of those companies that went bankrupt after being diagnosed, including Lehman Brothers, is available. Titan is the mystery company at the end of the video.

By Michael Markowski


DISCLOSURE: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please go to:


Symbol Name Price Change % Volume
DE Deere & Company 129.15 0.63 0.49 1,384,854 Trade
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. 10.34 -0.06 -0.58 390,337 Trade
CNHI CNH Industrial N.V. 12.02 0.05 0.42 677,463 Trade
CAT Caterpillar Inc. 131.36 0.59 0.45 3,086,775 Trade
TITN Titan Machinery Inc. 14.54 -0.17 -1.16 50,833 Trade
SGMLF Strategic Minerals Corp n/a n/a n/a 0


Emerging Growth

Taranis Resources Inc.

Taranis Resources Inc is an exploration stage company. The Company along with its subsidiaries is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. Its projects include Thor Property in…

Private Markets


Voleo is a free download that allows you to form investment clubs with your friends, family, colleagues, classmates, teammates…basically anyone you know and trust. Invest and manage a stock portfolio…

Quants Inc

Quants, Inc, a California Corporation, develops, markets and operates financial technology platforms and alternative investment products offering sophisticated risk management since 2010. The Company has primarily sharpened its focus with…