Actionable insights straight to your inbox

logo_equities.svg

Citigroup Settles with Disgruntled Investors for $590 Million

Another chapter of the Great Recession comes to a close as another financial giant has to pay a huge settlement related to unsavory business practices. A judge approved an offer from Citigroup
Jacob Harper received his BA from the University of Missouri in 2005, and his MA in Writing from Missouri State in 2009. He's written for American Express, Wisebread, LA Foodie, and Fox Digital, and he served as a Writer & Editor for the 2013 Los Angeles edition of the guidebook series Not For Tourists. Jacob currently lives in Los Angeles.
Jacob Harper received his BA from the University of Missouri in 2005, and his MA in Writing from Missouri State in 2009. He's written for American Express, Wisebread, LA Foodie, and Fox Digital, and he served as a Writer & Editor for the 2013 Los Angeles edition of the guidebook series Not For Tourists. Jacob currently lives in Los Angeles.

Another chapter of the Great Recession comes to a close as another financial giant has to pay a huge settlement related to unsavory business practices. A judge approved an offer from Citigroup  Inc. (C) to settle claims they hid tens of billions of dollars in toxic assets from investors. The settlement covered investors who bought into the company between February 2007 and April 2008.

Citigroup got burned badly in the subprime mortgage collapse, writing off $17 billion in losses in the fourth quarter of 2007 alone. But while they saw the losses coming, plaintiff’s lawyers argued the bank intentionally obfuscated the coming collapse, and were disingenuous in their presentation of the health of the company.

A spokeswoman from the bank, Shannon Bell, said simply “Citi is pleased to put the matter behind us.” This statement echoes – almost exactly word for word – what a spokesperson for JP Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM) said on July 29 when that company was forced to pay out a $410 million settlement after being accused of engineering a massive power price fixing scheme.

The settlement was less than what plaintiffs had been seeking. Lawyers for the plaintiff will receive $73.6 million instead of the $100 million they had been seeking.  The judge accused the plaintiff’s lawyers of engaging in gross overbilling, waste, and inefficiency

The settlement is a drop in the bucket of the total cost of the late aughts’ financial crisis. According to the Dallas Federal Reserve, the Great Recession cost the US economy $11.7 trillion.

Despite the settlement, Citigroup remains a highly profitable, $160.75 billion market cap company that easily beat its second quarter 2013 earnings expectations. Since dropping as low as $2.80 in January 2009, the stock has regained a considerable amount of its value, although it is still nowhere near its highs just prior to the collapse.

Citigroup was unfazed by the settlement news, and is up 1.43 percent to hit $52.88 a share. They’re up 26.40 percent on the year.

With pandemic-induced supply chain bottlenecks receding, semiconductor stocks have been riding a bullish trend, making higher lows and higher highs.
To say the current situation isn’t pretty now seems an understatement, and it’s likely to remain chaotic for a while. Which is why it’s so important for leaders of all kinds not to fall prey to the very human tendency to go negative.
Bargain-hunting friends of mine have been asking: “Should I buy First Republic?” After all, First Republic is prestigious. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg got a mortgage there. Dozens of customer surveys rate its satisfaction scores higher than super-brands like Apple and Ritz-Carlton.
Many of us economy-watchers have been expecting recession, though with significant differences on odds and timing. Regardless, recent banking developments just made recession more likely and may have accelerated its onset.