Beneficiaries of the Fed's U-Turn (aka QE4)

Ivan Martchev  |

iStockPhoto.com/portfolio/Willard

While the Federal Reserve maintains that its recent repurchase agreement activity – as well as the buying of Treasury bills of up to $60 billion – is not Quantitative Easing (QE), if the Fed balance sheet is growing and so are excess reserves in the banking system, it becomes the very definition of QE.

The operation – let’s call it QE4 – is supposed to carry through the second quarter of 2020, as per the Fed’s own statements. We don’t know when in the second quarter such QE maneuvers might end, but whether it’s April or June, we’re liable to see a record-high Fed balance sheet during that quarter.

The lowest reported point of the Fed’s balance sheet since the balance sheet normalization started was $3,759,946 million ($3.76 trillion rounded) on August 28, 2018. The latest reported level is about $4.05 trillion. That’s close to $300 billion in QE added in just 2½ months since the disruptions in overnight interest rate markets started in September. If the Federal Reserve carries the $60 billion monthly rate until the second quarter, that would mean that it would have surpassed the $4.5 trillion all-time high of its balance sheet holdings (set in February 2015) sometime during June of 2020.

Click to enlarge

How can one not be bullish in such an environment of ample liquidity infusion? Repurchase agreements, even though many are short-term, affect the level of the balance sheet. If the Fed overlaps multiple repurchase agreements at any given time, the Fed balance sheet could easily overshoot its all-time high.

I don't believe that the Fed’s balance sheet is the only determinant of the level of the stock market, but it sure is a major factor. Balance sheet expansion is like printing money – but for financial institutions only. It does affect the monetary base (excess reserves plus currency in circulation), which is the narrowest definition of money supply (M0). It basically causes asset price inflation without causing uncontrolled broad money supply growth, which is why has it has not (yet) resulted in hyperinflation.

Click to enlarge

In prior economic downturns, the Fed would lower interest rates, which would stimulate lending, which would help lift the economy out of a recession. After the 2008 downturn, the Fed not only lowered interest rates but provided a large amount of electronic dollars, called excess reserves, which first affected the prices of Treasury and mortgage securities, investment-grade corporate bonds and ultimately junk bonds and stocks. One could argue that the Fed pulled the economy out of a deflationary hole in large part using asset prices, so it was not the improving economy affecting the prices of financial assets, but financial assets causing the economy to improve. I think we have the similar QE dynamic at present.

While philosophically I do not find palatable such extreme levels of intervention in financial markets, since it has not backfired yet, one should assume the Fed would keep doing it, until/if/when it backfires.

What to Buy in the Present Environment?

The most obvious beneficiary of QE4 is gold bullion, particularly if it weakens the dollar. Gold and the dollar have been more or less rising in tandem over the past year, as it is hard for the dollar to decline when both the ECB and BOJ are involved in QE. Also, interest rate differentials still are very much in favor of the dollar. The recent $100 pullback from its 2019 high is probably a buying opportunity in gold.

Another beneficiary of QE would be risk assets, which would include members of the Nasdaq 100 Index, or the specific FAANG stocks, some of which have been appreciating in anticipation of a trade deal with China. The trade deal is important to the present rally in the stock market, as an escalation of trade tensions means higher tariffs and less global trade, which is putting the brakes on the global economy.

Click to enlarge

I think the Chinese have dragged out the trade negotiations intentionally late in the Presidential election cycle, as President Trump needs a victory to talk about in his election rallies. Now they will give him a half-baked deal known as “Phase I,” at which point both the chief Sun Tzu disciple from Beijing, as well as well as The Donald will be able to claim victory. Laggards like Wells Fargo (WFC)] should catch a bid in the present environment, as well as high-beta financials like Goldman Sachs(GS)].

A trade deal is likely to reverse, at least in the intermediate term, the nearly 10-year underperformance of emerging markets relative to the S&P 500. That means many of those Chinese stocks which are rising due to short covering or the reversal of no-trade-deal trades probably have more room to run with a trade deal. Obvious beneficiaries of a relief rally are Alibaba(BABA)], JD.com (JD)], Tencent Holdings (TCEHY)] and Baidu (BIDU)]. Investors interested in a more blanket approach should consider the iShares China LargeCap ETF(FXI)] and the more inclusive iShares Emerging Markets ETF(EEM)].

Click to enlarge

With a trade deal and accommodative Fed, a good target for the S&P 500 is the 3,400-3500 range. In a similar scenario, it is conceivable that the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, which registered a closing all-time high of 1328 in 2007, will try and retest that level in 2020.

Without a trade deal, however, all bets are off.

_____

Equities Contributor: Ivan Martchev

Source: Equities News

DISCLOSURE: Navellier & Associates does not own Wells Fargo (WFC), Goldman Sachs (GS), Alibaba (BABA), JD.com (JD), Tencent Holdings (TCEHY) and Baidu (BIDU) in managed accounts and our sub-advised mutual fund. Ivan Martchev does not own Wells Fargo (WFC), Goldman Sachs (GS), Alibaba (BABA), JD.com (JD), Tencent Holdings (TCEHY) and Baidu (BIDU) in personal accounts.


The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of equities.com. Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please go to: http://www.equities.com/disclaimer. The author of this article, or a firm that employs the author, is a holder of the following securities mentioned in this article : None

Companies

Symbol Name Price Change % Volume
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one 219.13 -3.24 -1.46 18,510,512 Trade
BIDU Baidu Inc. 134.20 -0.60 -0.45 4,152,384 Trade
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (The) 245.58 -1.47 -0.60 2,806,820 Trade
JD JD.com Inc. 40.77 -0.20 -0.49 14,606,682 Trade
WFC Wells Fargo & Company 48.22 -0.34 -0.70 17,297,843 Trade
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Ltd. ADR 49.85 -0.03 -0.06 4,581,735
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF 42.91 -0.56 -1.29 60,671,644
SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 331.72 0.38 0.11 51,939,021
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 44.96 -0.47 -1.03 88,714,278

Comments

Watchlist

Symbol Last Price Change % Change
AAPL

     
AMZN

     
HD

     
JPM

     
IBM

     
BA

     
WMT

     
DIS

     
GOOG

     
XOM

     
BRK.A

     
FB

     
JNJ

     
WFC

     
T

     
NFLX

     
TSLA

     
V

     
UNH

     
PG

     

Blockchain in Fintech - Discussion at the EU Parliament

From the recent Blockchain For Europe Summit in Brussels: Panel on Financial Market Infrastructure