Image source: CDC
As the SARS-like coronavirus is spreading across China, panic levels are increasing in financial markets around the world. U.S. Treasury bonds are rallying again and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index and the S&P 500 have begun to sell off. It’s too early to gauge the real impact, but so far there are similarities with the 2003 SARS outbreak in China which killed 800 and infected a little over 8,000 globally (I do not rely on the total accuracy of those numbers), resulting in a 10% mortality rate of deaths per infection.
It’s hard to trust the Chinese government with statistics when they are famous for cooking the books on their economic releases. Why would they not cook the books on this outbreak? So far, this coronavirus looks to be more contagious than SARS, which, ironically, is also a type of coronavirus, but we do not know if it is more deadly. That’s why when some researchers rushed to put together a non-peer-reviewed paper on January 24, it caught my attention. They expect to see 250,000 cases in China by February 4.
Here are the key findings from that paper:
- We estimate the basic reproduction number of the infection (??0) to be significantly greater than one. We estimate it to be between 3.6 and 4.0, indicating that 72-75% of transmissions must be prevented by control measures for infections to stop increasing.
- We estimate that only 5.1% (95%CI, 4.8–5.5) of infections in Wuhan are identified, indicating a large number of infections in the community, and also reflecting the difficulty in detecting cases of this new disease. Surveillance for this novel pathogen has been launched very quickly by public health authorities in China, allowing for rapid assessment of the speed of increase of cases in Wuhan and other areas.
- If no change in control or transmission happens, then we expect further outbreaks to occur in other Chinese cities, and that infections will continue to be exported to international destinations at an increasing rate. In 14 days’ time (4 February 2020), our model predicts the number of infected people in Wuhan to be greater than 190 thousand (prediction interval, 132,751 to 273,649). We predict the cities with the largest outbreaks elsewhere in China to be Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou, Chongqing and Chengdu. We also predict that by 4 Feb 2020, the countries or special administrative regions at greatest risk of importing infections through air travel are Thailand, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and South Korea.
- Our model suggests that travel restrictions from and to Wuhan city are unlikely to be effective in halting transmission across China; with a 99% effective reduction in travel, the size of the epidemic outside of Wuhan may only be reduced by 24.9% on 4 February.
- There are important caveats to the reliability of our model predictions, based on the assumptions underpinning the model as well as the data used to fit the model. These should be considered when interpreting our findings.
And here is a key table of estimates.
One of the more interesting points of this primary research is that its basic reproduction number of the infection (??0) is 3.8 (higher than SARS) and that only 5.1% of cases are detected.
Implications for Financial Markets
Treasury bonds will be up (they are already moving in that direction), the U.S. dollar will rally, and stocks will correct from what is now an overbought condition in the S&P 500, most likely to the tune of 5% to 10%. It has to be mentioned that the S&P 500 was 11% above its 200-day moving average last week, which is almost as extreme as in January 2018, when it was a tad over 13% above its 200-dma.
There is support on the 10-year Treasury yield at around 1.40%. In a global panic, Treasury bond yields can take out that support. The all-time intraday low of the 10-year Treasury bond yield is 1.31%. Even if that level is breached, Treasury bond yields should revert to the upside, should this turn out to be just a panic and not a real pandemic, such as the Spanish Flu of 1918-19.
Even if this type of coronavirus is more contagious than SARS (also a coronavirus that came from civets and bats) and it ultimately turns out like SARS – that is, contained and not as deadly as feared – then this will only mean a correction in the S&P 500 index and it may give investors an opportunity to buy the MSCI Emerging Markets Index and all those Chinese tech ADRs that had moved up because of the trade deal, but whose share prices were too overbought on a short-term basis.
It should be an interesting two weeks to see how this menace unfolds.
Equities Contributor: Ivan Martchev
Source: Equities News